Texas Humane Legislation Network (THLN) - Promoting the humane treatment of animals through legislation, education and advocacy

Michael Markarian of the Humane Society Legislative Fund has posted a detailed rundown of the current administration's track record regarding animal-related legislation over the past nine months. We'll summarize some of the good and bad points here, but please feel free to read Markarian's report here.

As you know, the subject of puppy mills has been a big part of THLN's focus. The administration put forth a proposal against puppy mills that run without any "public oversight." While this is definitely a step in the right direction, the administration failed to support the ban of importing puppies from puppy mills outside of the United States. However, the current legislation has also proposed the expansion of animal-reporting requirements by air carriers and has forced a New York company to stop selling items made from the fur of domestic dogs.

This administration seems to support the end of using chimpanzees in medical research; it has considered listing captive chimps on the endangered species list and has put together a group to investigate a report that chimps are not necessary for biomedical research. Unfortunately, President Obama's administration has also seemed to complicate the adoption of the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act that would effectively end the use of chimpanzees in "invasive research" and send all chimps owned by the federal government to sanctuaries.

The Obama Administration is hit or miss when it comes to farm animals. It has made it easier for employees and stakeholders to report the inhumane handling of farm animals and investigated a Florida company that was inhumanely slaughtering pigs; that company was then indicted. On the negative side, this administration has given hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies to meat producers without including any animal welfare conditions and, after three and a half years, has still not taken a stance on the Humane Society's "downer calf petition". This administration is also so/so regarding wildlife as it cracked down on illegal trade in animals and animal parts on the black market, but still continues to use inhumane methods to control wild predators.

Marine life has seen more positives than negatives from this administration. Protections for manatees have been improved. The administration has proposed a rule to help conserve sharks across the world and has tried to help protect dolphins from getting caught in mesh netting. Sea lions and whales have not been so lucky under the current administration, however. It approved more than four hundred sea lions to be killed at the Bonneville Dam and has not revised the critical habitat for North Atlantic right whales.

Horses have also been a major THLN focus recently. Horses have perhaps seen the most positives under the current administration's legislation. Minimum penalties for Horse Protection Act violations have been set. Horse slaughter plants have not been authorized. A fertility control vaccine for wild horses has been improved and other fertility control measures will be investigated. And, thankfully, Obama's administration has proposed a very large eco-sanctuary for wild horses. This administration's one negative regarding horses: it has allowed the use of problematic round-up procedures for over seven thousand horses.

Markarian has also posted a blog about how our legislators have voted regarding animal-related issues this legislative session. You can read the blog and link to a preview of HSLF's scorecard here. There are still four issues that need attention before Congress breaks until after the election. One, S. 3239 and H.R. 3798, will provide uniform standards for the treatment and housing of egg-laying hens. S. 810 and H.R. 1513, the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act, mentioned above, will help to end the practice of using chimpanzees in "invasive research". H.R. 2492 will create penalties for attending organized animal fights. And S. 707 and H.R. 835 will help to reform conditions in puppy mills. You can take action now by contacting your legislators and urging them to support these bills. Do you know who your legislators are? If not, click here to find out!

How do you feel about government's performance in animal-related issues? With the Presidential election coming up in only a couple of months, it will be interesting to see what changes may come with animal-related legislation. And no matter who wins that election, THLN will continue to push for humane legislation for all of the animals across Texas and the United States. Are you interested in helping us? Donate now or consider joining a local chapter! And don't forget about our Fourth Annual Conference coming up on September 28^th and 29^th! Register today to attend and click here for more information.

On January 17^th, the Humane Society of the United States released its 2011 ranking of state animal protection laws.  The highest-ranked state for the third year in a row was California, praised for enacting over twelve new measures. Animals in this state cannot be sold along roadsides or be trapped using steel-jawed traps. Further, in California, farm animals are protected from extreme confinement and mountain lions cannot be hunted for trophies.

So, where does Texas rank? Well, pretty much right in the middle at 25. Despite the slightly disappointing rating, Texas did move up nine ranks from the year before, so we are making progress! What gave our state its boost? Provisions against cockfighting and stricter breeding laws helped us move up from our rating of 36 in 2010.

Ranking dead last is the state of South Dakota. South Dakota and two other states, Idaho and North Dakota, have the unfortunate distinction of having no felony penalties for animal cruelty. South Dakota's citizens have also voted down measures that would protect animals from captive hunts.

You can check out the full rankings here. And, if you're interested in how the Texas state government did, you can see HSLF and THLN's Texas scorecard here.

You may have noticed a new link on our home page. THLN has had the unique honor of working with the Humane Society Legislative Fund on a Texas scorecard for the 2011 legislative session. Since the release of the federal government's scorecard, you might have been interested in how our state government measures up on animal-related legislation. The Texas scorecard measures how each senator and congressman voted for each of the nine animal-related issues (all of which were supported by THLN and HSLF save for one - that allowing feral hogs and coyotes to be shot from the air).

Overall, it looks like we didn't do too bad.

Out of the 31 state senators, the average score was about 84% inline with HSLF and THLN's mission with Democrats tending to score slightly higher than Republicans. Out of the 149 voting state representatives, the average score was about 79%, again with Democrats scoring slightly higher than Republicans. However, Mike Hamilton from district 19 (in East Texas) is a Republican who scored 100%!

Most important is that six of the nine issues supported by HSLF and THLN were passed into law. Now in Texas, people convicted of animal cruelty must reimburse shelters for the cost of providing care to their animals during their prosecutions. Those convicted can also be required to attend animal care classes. Cockfighting is now illegal. Humane care must now be provided to animals in high-volume breeding facilities. People providing care to animals in emergency situations have limited liability protection in lawsuits resulting from their care. And, likely to relieve countless victims of domestic violence, pets and other animal companions can now be included in protective orders.

How did your legislators vote? Did they follow your interests in animal welfare? Let them know how you feel about their decisions. Don't know who your legislators are? Find them here.

Despite congressional fighting on both sides and across the aisle, 2011 was a relatively successful year for animals. Let's take a brief look at what Humane Society Legislative Fund writer Michael Markarian had to say about Congress's successes and setbacks for 2011 and where they will likely focus their attention in 2012.

Even though most of us, including our government, have been tightening the proverbial "purse strings", animal successes in 2011 largely came in the form of budget boosts to animal-related acts and governmental organizations. Two of these are increases in the Department of Agriculture budget and the enforcement budget for the Horse Prevention Act. With more funds, inspections of animal-related facilities like puppy mills, circuses, zoos, and laboratories will hopefully ensure humane conditions for animals everywhere. Other budget increases will help prevent the Bureau of Land Management from killing wild horses and burros, ensure protection of key aspects of the Endangered Species Act, and halt the military and other groups from performing certain tests on animals.

The setbacks in 2011 come from the prevalence of politics over protection. As most animal advocates are aware, language protecting horses from slaughter for human consumption was not renewed in USDA funding language. Further, gray wolves lost their Endangered Species Act protections, allowing hunters to take advantage of the sensitive species and maybe opening the floodgates for future political subversion of other protected species. Even more disturbing is the continued, though seemingly-useless (as it affects around 1% of the livestock population), subsidy that allows private livestock ranchers to use tax dollars to inhumanely poison, trap, or otherwise kill predators when plenty of other humane options are available.

Click here to read Hot Off the Press: 112th Congress Midterm Humane Scorecard on Michael Markarian's blog where he reviews the final version of the 2011 Humane Scorecard which tracks the performance of your federal lawmakers on key animal protection issues during last year.

Looking ahead, there will be several animal issues that will likely crop up in 2012. These issues will undoubtedly include those revolving around service animals, puppy mills, dog and cock fighting, horse-racing, animal testing, livestock and food safety, wildlife conservation, hunting, and more. Stay tuned to THLN and we will keep you updated on the issues that impact the animals we all love and strive to protect.

With presidential elections coming up, it is important for animal advocates to know where the candidates stand on animal issues. Using the Humane Society Legislative Fund's Humane Scorecard (a score of 0 to 100, with 100 being the most animal-friendly which applies to members of Congress only), Michael Markarian has written a detailed summary of each GOP candidate's stance on animal issues.

According to the scorecard and a review of the candidate's actions, the most animal-friendly GOP candidate for the 2012 presidential election look to be Rick Santorum (score: 80 during the 109th congress).  Jon Huntsman and to a lesser-degree, Rick Perry, neither of whom have scores as they're not in congress, have both signed several animal-friendly bills into law in their states and therefore are both considered to be animal-friendly as well.

The rest of the GOP candidates are not as animal-friendly or are downright non-committal on the issues. Michelle Bachmann's most recent score (though she has now dropped out of the race) was a dismal 13 out of 100 while Ron Paul scored a whopping ZERO in the 110th congressional session, though he may manage to get a 25 for 2011. Newt Gingrich, the last time he was scored, got a measly 21. Mitt Romney, who has not been scored, has come under fire from animal advocates numerous times, not only for his public record with animal issues, but his horrible treatment of a family pet during a vacation. Even though he has recently signed some animal protection bills into law, let me just say: would you like to ride on top of a car in a carrier for twelve hours?

The Humane Society's President and CEO, Wayne Pacelle, gave President Obama a C minus in his blog. This negative score is highly due to stalling, indifference, and inaction on the part of the President, particularly in issues regarding horses, subsidies, and the protection of sensitive species. The few positives were in the President's push to increase funding for the Animal Welfare Act and his stance against puppy mills. Pacelle summed it perfectly by saying, "Despite campaign promises that he'd be strong on humane issues, the President has failed to pull together a coherent animal welfare strategy or to deliver any kind of message to our community of 20,000 animal protection organizations and millions of animal-loving Americans throughout the country."

So, as the 2012 elections draw near, let's make sure to do our research and get a candidate in office, no matter what party they may be from, that cares about protecting the welfare of animals as much as we do!